Logics of Interaction , Coalitions and Social Choice ( extended abstract )
نویسندگان
چکیده
While different forms of social interaction have been extensively studied in several fields, the development of formal logics makes precise knowledge representation and mechanical reasoning about situations involving social interaction possible. In particular, such logics make it possible to formally specify and verify software implementing social mechanisms. In my talk I will give an overview of some of our recent work on logics for social interaction, in particular applied to reasoning about social choice mechanisms such as voting and preference aggregation as well as reasoning about coalition formation and coalitional stability. We use benchmark examples from game theory and social choice theory to illustrate the expressiveness of the logics.
منابع مشابه
Expressivity and Complexity of Reasoning about Coalitional Interaction: Extended Abstract
This paper studies expressivity and complexity of normal modal logics for reasoning about coalitional power in multi-agent systems with agents that have preferences. A class of local and global notions relevant for reasoning about cooperation is identified. Many of these notions naturally correspond to concepts from game theory or social choice theory. The expressive power required to express t...
متن کاملAnonymity in large societies
We formalize the notion of coalition measure as a primitive of social choice with a countably infinite number of agents. An example would be a dynamic setting with an infinite horizon, where it may be convenient to consider separately each individual’s preferences at every moment of time. In this setting, there are some “equal size” coalitions that a social choice rule should treat in the same ...
متن کاملAndrei Gomberg . César Martinelli . Ricard Torres Anonymity in large societies
In a social choice model with an infinite number of agents, there may occur “equal size” coalitions that a preference aggregation rule should treat in the samemanner.We introduce an axiom of equal treatment with respect to ameasure of coalition size and explore its interaction with common axioms of social choice. We show that, provided the measure space is sufficiently rich in coalitions of the...
متن کاملSocial Viewpoints for Arguing about Coalitions
Frameworks for arguing about coalitions are based on non-monotonic logic and are therefore formal and abstract, whereas social theories about agent coalitions typically are based on conceptual modeling languages and therefore semi-formal and detailed. In this paper we bridge the gap between these two research areas such that social viewpoints can be used to argue about coalitions. We formally d...
متن کاملPower Indices and minimal winning Coalitions
The Penrose-Banzhaf index and the Shapley-Shubik index are the best-known and the most used tools to measure political power of voters in simple voting games. Most methods to calculate these power indices are based on counting winning coalitions, in particular those coalitions a voter is decisive for. We present a new combinatorial formula how to calculate both indices solely using the set of m...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008